Newcastle’s Anthony Gordon joins growing calls for VAR to be scrapped if technology doesn’t improve Football News

Anthony Gordon has raised questions about the purpose of VAR after a penalty was denied in Newcastle United’s 3-2 loss to Manchester United at Old Trafford.

On the day it was announced that Wolves are pushing for VAR to be scrapped from the Premier League next season, referee Robert Jones and VAR Jared Gillette ignored a strong point after Sofyan Amrabat stepped on his foot while trying to recover. The England striker was outraged as the ball appealed.

talking sky sports After the game Gordon said: “[My ankle’s] Really hurts. Not sure how good my ankle will be.

“I looked at it and it was a clear penalty. I don’t mind the referee making the wrong decision on the field, but I don’t understand what VAR is about. It’s about correcting mistakes.”

“Amrabat stepped on my Achilles tendon and pushed me from behind. Casemiro got the ball but had two fouls before that. I just don’t see the point.” [VAR].

“I knew it immediately and that’s why I didn’t appeal because I didn’t mind if the referee didn’t give it. It was fast. But I will wait for the VAR check. You can see me telling my teammates that it was a clear penalty.

“Then we move on and I don’t have any socks anymore. How is that possible?”

Wolves have ended the season over several controversial refereeing decisions and believe the decision review system is “undermining the value of the Premier League brand”.

They have submitted a resolution to be put to a vote at the league’s annual general meeting in June and will need the consent of 13 of the other 19 clubs. They are likely to lobby other clubs to gain support between now and next month’s meeting.

The Premier League does not believe abolishing VAR is the right way forward.

“This is a big decision,” Gordon continued after receiving the proposal. “I actually like it [VAR], I really like this idea. It should work, but it doesn’t.

“There are always too many mistakes. We miss too many chances to blame on other things, but we can go 1-0 up and the game changes.”

“It’s a clear mistake. I don’t know how you can go wrong. Either get rid of it or get better, simple.”

When Eddie Howe was asked to cancel VAR, the Newcastle manager said: “I’ve been in an era where the referee made the decision and I supported it.

“I might keep it [VAR] Offside but I wish the referee had more power.

More VAR drama dominates Chelsea vs Brighton match

Mauricio Pochettino admitted Reece James’ late red card was “painful” as Chelsea moved to the brink of European qualification with a 2-1 win over Brighton in the Premier League.

Blues captain James was sacked for the second time in an injury-plagued season following a lengthy VAR review after he kicked down Seagulls striker Joao Pedro in the 88th minute at the Amex Stadium. .

The England defender came on in the 69th minute for just his second appearance since December following hamstring surgery as he faces a four-match ban and has been sidelined with Gareth Southgate confirmed for 2024 The preliminary squad for the 2020 European Cup will not be able to compete again until then.

“It’s difficult to express my opinion because I don’t have time to watch the game,” Blues coach Pochettino said of James’ costly revenge. “I turned away at that moment so I needed to see it again but I don’t think Reese’s intention was to hurt the opponent.

“Maybe it was his frustration. But yes, it hurt. It hurt because it was a great night of football and he was our captain and a very important player.”

“I’m disappointed because now he will miss the next game and maybe even a few games next season.”

By then, Chelsea had seen an on-field penalty awarded by referee Michael Salisbury overturned by VAR official Peter Banks, who deemed Facundo Bonanotte was in contact with Marc Cucurella kicked the ball during the confrontation.

In another flashpoint of the first half, Mihailo Mudric was forced off with a head injury after an off-the-ball incident with Tariq Lamptey, but was not punished.

Regarding the Mudrick incident, Pochettino said: “From my position it is difficult to see it, but too many things happened and we had to look at VAR.

“I’d rather the referee makes the decision. Of course, both sides make mistakes. It’s frustrating.”

Nicolas Jackson’s push on Lamptey in the first half also resulted in a goal being disallowed.

“It’s hard to see from where I stand but we need to move on and see if we can improve the use of VAR next season. For me it’s not about VAR in and out, yes or no. It’s about improvement The way we use VAR.

“I think it would be amazing if it could be used in a really good way. The problem here is that we judge some similar situations in very different ways. That’s the problem.

“When Jackson rounded the goalie, [as] A yellow card. Sometimes, it’s a red card. We must agree on the results of specific actions. The most important thing is the person in charge of VAR.

Salisbury did not check the pitchside monitor when Seagulls winger Simon Ardingra appeared to be fouled by Marlo Gusteau in the 1-0 draw.

Roberto De Zerbi felt his side had been awarded a blatant penalty and criticized Salisbury’s performance while expressing sympathy for James, who scored in Chelsea’s 4-1 win over Newcastle in November. He was also sent off with a red card during the game.

“We have to talk about the level of referees as much as we talk about the level of coaches,” said the Italian. “There are people behind VAR and we have to analyze the referee’s level.

“I didn’t like the referee today. But not because of the penalty, because if we win or lose this game (in terms of league position), nothing changes for us.

“I don’t like his personality and control of the game. I’m sorry for James’ red card because I think it’s a normal reaction.

“If you’ve played football in your life, you might have this reaction, but it was obvious with Aldingra’s penalty and it was obvious on my bench. On TV it was clearer.”

Premier League chief football officer Tony Scholes said Premier League statistics earlier this season showed an increase in correct decisions under VAR from 82% to 96% sky sports February: “VAR was, and still is, a very effective tool in supporting match officials on the pitch.”

However, Scholes admitted: “We did too many checks and it took too long. That’s understandable to some extent given the level of scrutiny these people are under. But it took too long. , and it’s impacting the flow of the game, we’re very aware of that and the need to increase speed while always maintaining accuracy.

Meanwhile, Premier League officials believe the proposal would severely impact its reputation as one of world football’s elite leagues and mean there would be no semi-automatic offsides or in-stadium announcements to spectators as the top flight has been pushing for.

A Premier League spokesman said: “The Premier League can confirm that it will discuss VAR issues with our clubs at next month’s AGM.

“Clubs have the right to put forward proposals at shareholder meetings and we acknowledge the concerns and issues surrounding the use of VAR.

“However, the League fully supports the use of VAR and remains committed to working with the PGMOL to continuously improve the system for the benefit of the game and fans.”

Wolves have ended the season over several controversial refereeing decisions and believe the decision review system is “undermining the value of the Premier League brand”.

However, they will need 13 of the other 19 clubs to agree with them and may lobby others to gain support between now and next month’s meeting.

How to book Fury vs Usyk fight at Sky Sports Ticket Office

It’s one of the biggest sporting events in a generation. Tyson Fury and Alexander Usyk The undisputed heavyweight championship of the world is up for grabs live on Sky Sports Box Office on Saturday 18 May. Book a fight now