Wyoming Congresswoman Harriet Hagman recently spoke with Gateway Pundit about the New York v. Trump trial and the Democrats behind President Trump’s persecution, including Judge Murchin, whose “disgusting “Shocking” ruling aimed at convicting Trump but was later overturned on appeal.
“At the same time, before the election, Democrats can claim that Donald Trump is a convicted felon,” Hagman said.
Trump’s defense rested its case on Tuesday and is expected to make closing arguments next week.
Gateway Pundit reports on the first part of our exclusive interview with Rep. Hagerman, in which we discuss last week’s congressional hearings to advance a resolution that would make corrupt Attorney General Merrick Garland is in contempt of Congress for refusing to turn over tapes of special counsel Robert Hull’s interview with Joe Biden.
The Gateway Pundit reports that last Thursday afternoon, the House Judiciary Committee voted to pass a resolution to hold the corrupt Garland in contempt of court for refusing to provide a tape of an interview with Hull that exposed the current White House occupant as nothing more than It’s the “old man”.
Late Thursday, the House Oversight Committee also voted 24-20 to recommend that Garland be held in contempt of Congress.
Hagerman blasted Garland for flouting the law “to protect Joe Biden and advance the Democratic agenda” by hiding Biden’s cognitive decline:
We also discussed the persecution of bad actors like Donald Trump and Rep. Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.), who has ties to the judge’s family. please look below.
The Gateway Pundit recently reported that Rep. Goldman, a loyal supporter of Joe Biden and a client of Judge Juan Merchant’s daughter firm, was involved with Cohen prior to his testimony in the sham Biden/Bragg trial. Several preparatory meetings were held with Cohen.
Hagman attacked Democratic Rep. Dan Goldman during a Judiciary Committee hearing on Wednesday for not only preparing to testify against fraudster Michael Cohen but also for the silent investigation. Merchan’s daughter’s consulting firm provided her salary and provided her with more than $150,000. Her father is overseeing the sham election interference trial against top Democratic political rival Donald J. Trump.
Conflict of interest? Rep. Hagerman scolds Democrat Dan Goldman for preparing Michael Cohen testimony while paying more than $150,000 to Judge Murchin’s daughter’s company (Video)
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna made similar criticisms of Goldman and Judge Juan Merchan’s daughter outside a Manhattan courthouse on Thursday during Trump’s trial:
Luna: “It’s no coincidence that Goldman Sachs was a member of the House Oversight Committee, the Democrat who prepared Cohen’s testimony, and he was retained as a client by the judge’s daughter. In your opinion, isn’t this a scam? This is Corrupt laws.
Rep. Hagerman further blasted Goldman Sachs for working with con man Michael Cohen “in an effort to go after Donald Trump” and Judge Murchin’s misconduct in presiding over the case to interfere with the 2024 election.
Hagman also blasted the judge for making reversible errors, including gag orders and limiting the testimony of Trump’s star witness, former Federal Election Commissioner Bradley Smith, whom she called “the most important person in American federal election law.” “One of the experts.”
“It’s almost as if he knowingly made the most egregious reversible error, knowing that if convicted, it would be overturned on appeal. But at the same time, before the election, Democrats could claim that Donald Trump was the one convicted.” Felon,” Hagerman told PortalExpert reporter Jordan Conradson. “That’s what this means.”
Fox reports,
Former President Trump’s legal team was scheduled to call the former commissioner of the Federal Election Commission to testify in the New York v. Trump case, but the expert’s testimony was not heard because the trial judge limited the scope of his discussion in front of the jury.
Former Federal Election Commissioner Bradley Smith posted on Instructing the law is pretty basic, so I understand his reluctance.
“But the federal campaign bill is very complex. Even Antonin Scalia — a very smart man, even if you hate him — once said, ‘This [campaign finance] The law is so complicated that I can’t understand it. Imagine a jury in a product liability case trying to decide whether a complex machine was negligently designed based solely on a boilerplate recitation of the general definition of “negligence.” Without understanding the technology and industry norms, they will be lost,” he continued.
Smith, an election law expert whom Trump has called a “Rolls Royce” of experts in the field, can speak to the court about the basic definition of election law but not expand upon it after Judge Juan Merchant ruled After the range, he would not testify.
Watch below:
Conradson: I saw you raging against Democrat Dan Goldman for paying $150,000 to Judge Silk’s daughter for their witch hunt against the president as a consultant. So does that mean helping his campaign or, honestly, following Donald Trump, who knows what that means?
Hagman: The irony of yesterday’s hearing was that it was about how our justice system has been weaponized against Donald Trump and conservatives. The whole idea is that we have to have equal protection under the law; whether you’re a Republican or a Democrat, you should be treated the same. What we’re seeing is our judicial system going after conservatives and President Trump to prevent them from succeeding. That’s what hearings are for. And then you listen to Dan Goldman, who is absolutely talking about how terrible Donald Trump is and that he’s on trial and he should be on trial and blah blah blah. I think everyone should know what the conflict is for him to make these accusations. The first one is that he’s paying, he’s paid $157,000 in consulting fees to Judge Murchin’s daughter to help get him elected so that he could attack Republicans and Donald Trump. So, there’s a lot of irony in that. The other thing is, he explained on MSNBC earlier this week that he actually helped prepare Cohen, the prosecutor’s star witness, the liar and the perjurer, the serial perjurer, Cohen! He actually helped him get ready to testify at one point. Again, this man teamed up with a known liar and perjurer to go after Donald Trump. I think it’s clear that our government is being weaponized against Donald Trump and conservatives.
Conradson: In all your years as a lawyer, do you think it’s possible, that a judge is so conflicted, that there are so many conflicts of interest in addition to being a judge?
Hagman: No. Another thing you’ll see is when you go to trial and you try to bring exhibits in, the judge may say, ‘Yeah, I’m not going to allow you to bring this exhibit in but you can have this witness, ” and “Without prosecution, you don’t need this document, but you can have this witness.” They will balance the award in a way to ensure it is fair to both parties. The other thing is, we had a gentleman testify before our committee yesterday who was a prosecutor in the Department of Justice for over 30 years, and he testified that he had never seen a gag order issued against a defendant. A gag order may be issued against prosecutors so they do not have their case heard in the media or leak information. There are gag orders, but they generally apply to the prosecution, not the defendant. The defendant has the right to defend himself. They have a First Amendment right to defend themselves, whether in the court of public opinion or in the courts themselves. So what’s happening now is that every ruling Judge Murchin makes goes against Donald Trump. He’s not fair at all. He’s not even trying to be fair at this point.
It was as if he deliberately made the most egregious and reversible error because he knew that if convicted, it would be overturned on appeal. But at the same time, before the election, Democrats can claim that Donald Trump is a convicted felon. That’s the purpose of this article. Because this judge made such an incredible reversible error. He would not allow one of the nation’s foremost experts on federal election law, who served as an expert witness in his defense of Donald Trump, to prove that he did not violate federal election law. He is the former chairman of the FEC (Federal Elections Commission). He had been hired as an expert witness by Donald Trump, and the judge blocked him from testifying that Trump did not violate federal election laws. Well, that’s the basis of the prosecution’s case. If you had the world’s foremost experts on this particular issue come in and give an expert opinion, obviously we know what the verdict is going to be. This judge excluded that testimony; it was egregious and clearly a reversible error. Beyond that, you have a conflict of interest. His daughter raised nearly $100 million for Democratic candidates who then began attacking Republicans and Donald Trump. Clearly, this is another conflict of interest. And, you know, I’ll be watching what he decides. I looked at the ruling, the pretrial rulings that he made, and I’m sorry, but some of the decisions he made were absolutely ridiculous.
