this Biden Industrial Review Complex The Justice Department scored them a major victory this week amy coney barrettThis Trump appointee has betrayed the First Amendment and the president’s supporters who nominated her, supporting the Biden administration’s continued suppression of free speech. Judge Barrett wrote Murthy v. Missouri The decision allows the Biden administration to continue censoring conservative online publications through mandates on social media companies.
There is no historical precedent for the federal government using a vast system to force social media companies to comply. Justice Alito dissented, calling Murthy one “The most important free speech case to come to the court in years.”
this Murthy The decision, written by Judge Barrett, was influenced behind the scenes by a legal staffer whose wife has ties to Biden’s industrial review agency.
Among the smaller topics that have become unmentionable due to requests from White House officials to take them down: Hunter Biden’s criminal laptop, COVID lockdowns, the effectiveness of masks, the effectiveness of the virus, voter fraud and election integrity.
this White House and Supreme Court majority agree: You cannot criticize the clearly fraudulent 2020 election and express that opinion online. There is no way to prevent the government from asking you to delete your political views online, and Missouri v. Biden There is progress in the case.
The censorship system is vast and complex. “Fact-checking” organizations “rate” news coverage for accuracy, always deeming conservative news and opinions false and illegitimate, and always rating left-wing lies as completely accurate and true. These ratings are then aggregated, Then combine it with other sloppy and dishonest “analysis” Overall media “rating” by NewsGuard. This overall rating is then used by far-left pressure groups and governments to formally suppress and demonetise etc. Waging economic war against conservative mediato ensure they become bankrupt or unprofitable.
A key link in this entity chain is News Guardianpublished in 2018 by Gordon Crovitz and Steven Brill. NewsGuard has been hostile to the Gateway Pundit since its inception and is hostile to conservative journalism. House Republicans investigate ways NewsGuard suppressed conservative news and views earlier this monthnoted that the entity appears to be aimed at suppressing speech and works with the military to provide much of its funding.
Another key player in this infrastructure is Mark OppenheimerHe is a former professor at Yale University and director of the Yale Journalism Program. In May, Oppenheimer moved to St. Louis to work at the John C. Danforth Institute on Religion and Politics at Washington University. Former Missouri Senator and Missouri Attorney General John C. Danforth personally represents Freeman and Moss in an ongoing defamation lawsuit against the Gateway Pundit involving Freeman and Moss Trump was accused of defamation in the Gateway Pundit report on 2020 voter fraud.
Another key piece of Biden’s effort to scrutinize the industrial complex is the Stanford Internet Observatory, which was founded in 2019 and funded by the billionaire founder of Craigslist.org Craig Newmark. Newmark also generously funds “disinformation” and censorship efforts Yale University, as well as other colleges. Craig Newmark also sponsors the Yale Media Accessibility Clinic annually at Yale Law School. Newmark’s website, Craigslist.org, was threatened by the federal government in 2018 for facilitating human and sex trafficking. adults.
That same year, Craig Newmark became the major private funder of most censorship bodies, along with other high-profile funders including George Soros’s Open Society Foundation, Bill Bill Gates and the Gates Foundation, as well as Google, Facebook, etc.
“Small donations” to Newmark in the area of suppression and censorship ranged from $50,000 to $100,000. You can see this in this email:
Steven Brill calls himself a journalist. He founded CourtTV in 1991 and started a series of failed ventures. He wrote a series of obscure books before founding NewsGuard in 2018. Yale University Since 2001, NewsGuard has been his most successful endeavor to date. NewsGuard works with various operatives from big tech companies and the deep state, including former National Security Agency director Michael Hayden, who belongs to NewsGuard. Hayden has called whistleblower Edward Snowden a “traitor” and WikiLeaks’ Julian Assange an “infoterrorist.” Brill sits at the intersection of the deep state, the Biden industrial censorship system, elite mainstream journalism, and Yale University.
Brill, Oppenheimerand Yale University Also linked to Connor Mui, one of Coney Barrett’s legal assistants.
Legal clerks typically work for a year in the federal judiciary, assisting judges with research, drafting, and writing. The level of expert involvement varies, but many judges are known to rely on clerks to research and write their entire opinions.
Judge Barrett’s law clerk Mui and his current wife, Raleigh Cavero, are both graduates of Yale Law School. May and Cabello are both graduates of Yale Law School.
May and Cabello were married in December.
Yale University is one of the centers of anti-free speech efforts in the country, funded and promoted by: Soros‘ and Newmark’s Billions.
Newmark Help fund News Guardian. NewsGuard also receives funding from the U.S. State Department and the U.S. military, ostensibly to “help combat disinformation.”
News Guardian Millions of dollars funded by the Deep State and the Biden administration to help Biden scrutinize the operations of the industrial complex.
The man who wrote Coney Barrett’s insane judicial opinion may have been one of the law clerks on the decision that saw Joe Biden, NewsGuard, Yale, Steven Brill, Mark Oppenheim Merger absolved herself of responsibility and allowed them to move on from Soros and Craig Newmark, whose husband is a lawyer with important ties to the review group, accidentally left Brill on her resume and Oppenheimer prominently.
Yale Law School The school’s MFIA clinic was delighted when Gateway Pundit was sued for libel.
There is no enforceable code of conduct for Supreme Court justices to recuse themselves from cases, but is self-directed. Judges should recuse themselves when their impartiality may be questioned. The far left has been trying to force Judge Clarence Thomas to recuse himself from what his outspoken and courageous wife Ginny Thomas has done in her private capacity. The mainstream media often blasts Justice Thomas for perceived conflicts of interest.
Most recently, the far left tried to force Justice Samuel Alito to recuse himself because he flew a distress flag outside his house during the election. The New York Times even took the time to report on Judge Alito flying the “Appellate Haven” flag and why it could lead to him recusing himself from future cases due to alleged ties to the January 6 protesters and Christianity .
Notably, in 1950, when Soviet spy Alger Hiss appealed his perjury conviction to the Supreme Court, three judges recused themselves because of their past closeness to Hiss, including Hiss’s mentor Judge Felix Frankfurter and Hiss’s former boss at the Justice Department, Judge Stanley Reed.
Section 3F(1) of the Judiciary Code of Conduct advises judicial employees, including legal staff, to avoid conflicts of interest for themselves and their spouses.
The relevant parts of the Code provide that,
“A conflict arises when you – or your spouse or other close relative – may be personally or financially affected by something in such a way that a reasonable person would question your impartiality. Considerations that apply to spouses It also applies to people who have a close relationship with the staff member.
Calls and emails to Raleigh Cabello and the Supreme Court’s Office of Public Information went unanswered.
