As yesterday’s post noted, the ban states,
[1.] defendant [UCLA officials] … prohibits making any generally available program, activity, or campus area available to a student if the defendant knows that Jewish students do not have full and equal access to that program, activity, or campus area.
[2.] Defendants are prohibited from knowingly allowing or facilitating the exclusion of Jewish students from normally available portions of UCLA’s programs, activities, and campus areas, whether as a result of relegation tactics or otherwise.
[3.] On or before August 15, 2024, Defendants shall direct the Student Affairs Mitigation/Monitor (“SAM”) and any and all campus security teams (including, but not limited to, UCPD and UCLA Security Teams) not to assist or participate in any efforts to obstruct access. ACT provides programs, activities, and campus areas generally available to Jewish students.
[4.] For the purposes of this Order, all references to the exclusion of Jewish students shall include the exclusion of Jewish students based on the religious beliefs of the Jewish State of Israel.
[5.] Nothing in this order prevents defendants from excluding Jewish students from generally available programs, activities, and campus areas in accordance with the UCLA Code of Conduct standards that apply to all UCLA students.
[6.] If the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit does not stay enforcement of the injunction, this preliminary injunction will become effective on August 15, 2024 and will remain in effect pending the trial of this action or further order of this court or the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit .
For more information on the district court’s reasoning, see here. Under Ninth Circuit rules, appeals of preliminary injunctions are typically heard within a few months.